Modular Product Verifications Based on Design for Assembly
Document identifier: oai:dalea.du.se:1219
Keyword: Engineering and Technology,
Mechanical Engineering,
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics,
Teknik och teknologier,
Maskinteknik,
Produktionsteknik, arbetsvetenskap och ergonomi,
Design for assembly,
Product verifications,
Product defects,
Modular productsPublication year: 2005Relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
The SDG label(s) above have been assigned by OSDG.aiAbstract: The desire to conquer markets through advanced product design and trendy business strategies are still predominant approaches in industry today. In fact, product development has acquired an ever more central role in the strategic planning of companies, and it has extended its influence to R&D funding levels as well. It is not surprising that many national R&D project frameworks within the EU today are dominated by product development topics, leaving production engineering, robotics, and systems on the sidelines. The reasons may be many but, unfortunately, the link between product development and the production processes they cater for are seldom treated in depth. The issue dealt with in this article relates to how product development is applied in order to attain the required production quality levels a company may desire, as well as how one may counter assembly defects and deviations through quantifiable design approaches. It is recognized that product verifications (tests, inspections, etc.) are necessary, but the application of these tactics often result in lead-time extensions and increased costs. Modular architectures improve this by simplifying the verification of the assembled product at module level. Furthermore, since Design for Assembly (DFA) has shown the possibility to identify defective assemblies, it may be possible to detect potential assembly defects already in the product and module design phase. The intention of this paper is to discuss and describe the link between verifications of modular architectures, defects and design for assembly. The paper is based on literature and case studies; tables and diagrams are included with the intention of increasing understanding of the relation between poor designs, defects and product verifications.
Authors
Patrik Kenger
Högskolan Dalarna; Maskinteknik
Other publications
>>
Anders Bergdahl
Other publications
>>
Mauro Onori
Other publications
>>
Documents attached
|
Click on thumbnail to read
|
Record metadata
Click to view metadata
header:
identifier: oai:dalea.du.se:1219
datestamp: 2021-04-15T13:36:10Z
setSpec: SwePub-du
metadata:
mods:
@attributes:
version: 3.7
recordInfo:
recordContentSource: du
recordCreationDate: 2005-06-03
identifier: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-1219
titleInfo:
@attributes:
lang: eng
title: Modular Product Verifications Based on Design for Assembly
abstract: The desire to conquer markets through advanced product design and trendy business strategies are still predominant approaches in industry today. In fact product development has acquired an ever more central role in the strategic planning of companies and it has extended its influence to R&D funding levels as well. It is not surprising that many national R&D project frameworks within the EU today are dominated by product development topics leaving production engineering robotics and systems on the sidelines. The reasons may be many but unfortunately the link between product development and the production processes they cater for are seldom treated in depth. The issue dealt with in this article relates to how product development is applied in order to attain the required production quality levels a company may desire as well as how one may counter assembly defects and deviations through quantifiable design approaches. It is recognized that product verifications (tests inspections etc.) are necessary but the application of these tactics often result in lead-time extensions and increased costs. Modular architectures improve this by simplifying the verification of the assembled product at module level. Furthermore since Design for Assembly (DFA) has shown the possibility to identify defective assemblies it may be possible to detect potential assembly defects already in the product and module design phase. The intention of this paper is to discuss and describe the link between verifications of modular architectures defects and design for assembly. The paper is based on literature and case studies; tables and diagrams are included with the intention of increasing understanding of the relation between poor designs defects and product verifications.
subject:
@attributes:
lang: eng
authority: uka.se
topic:
Engineering and Technology
Mechanical Engineering
Production Engineering Human Work Science and Ergonomics
@attributes:
lang: swe
authority: uka.se
topic:
Teknik och teknologier
Maskinteknik
Produktionsteknik arbetsvetenskap och ergonomi
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: Design for assembly
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: product verifications
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: product defects
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: modular products
language:
languageTerm: eng
genre:
conference/other
ref
note:
Published
3
name:
@attributes:
type: personal
authority: du
namePart:
Kenger
Patrik
role:
roleTerm: aut
affiliation:
Högskolan Dalarna
Maskinteknik
nameIdentifier:
pke
0000-0001-7472-3306
@attributes:
type: personal
namePart:
Bergdahl
Anders
role:
roleTerm: aut
@attributes:
type: personal
namePart:
Onori
Mauro
role:
roleTerm: aut
originInfo:
dateIssued: 2005
place:
placeTerm: Providence - Warwick Rhode Island USA
relatedItem:
@attributes:
type: host
titleInfo:
title: International Forum on Design for Manufacture and Assembly
location:
url: http://du.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:521468/FULLTEXT01.pdf
accessCondition: gratis
physicalDescription:
form: electronic
typeOfResource: text