Production strategies for pre-engineering in house-building
Exploring product development platforms
Document identifier: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-7685
Access full text here:
10.1080/01446193.2013.828846Keyword: Engineering and Technology,
Civil Engineering,
Building Technologies,
Teknik och teknologier,
Samhällsbyggnadsteknik,
Husbyggnad,
Engineer-to-order,
Industrialized building,
Civil engineering and architecture - Building engineering,
Samhällsbyggnadsteknik och arkitektur - Byggnadsteknik,
Träbyggnad,
Timber StructuresPublication year: 2013Relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
The SDG label(s) above have been assigned by OSDG.aiAbstract: Construction is a trade where the dominating production strategy is engineer-to-order. House-builders can pre-engineer their design to different degrees, resulting in variations of the engineer-to-order strategy: design-to-order, adapt-to-order, and engineer-to-stock. This variation causes different settings for the use ofplatforms in house-building. The aim of this research is to diversify the engineer-to-order production strategy and its consequences for platform organization by studying its use in house-building. The multiple case study on four engineering/contractor firms reports the core capabilities for engineer-to-order firms: procurement and tendering, market knowledge, engineering, multi-skilled manufacturing, and coordination of sales and manufacturing. Design-to-order, adapt-to-order and engineer-to stock were shown to be production strategies in use in house-building. In design-to-order platforms parts of the platform are undefined while engineer-to-stock platforms are fully predefined. Coordination between market and manufacturing is a crucial capability when engaging in platform organization. When an engineering firm and a contractor collaborate to fulfil client needs, the coordination capability between market and manufacturing was shown to be low. The case study shows that specialized contractors who integrate the supply chain towards a specific market segment benefit fully from the platform concept, while contractors with a wider scope could focus on standardization of processes rather than products.
Authors
Helena Johnsson
Luleå tekniska universitet; Byggkonstruktion och -produktion
Other publications
>>
Record metadata
Click to view metadata
header:
identifier: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-7685
datestamp: 2021-04-19T12:27:33Z
setSpec: SwePub-ltu
metadata:
mods:
@attributes:
version: 3.7
recordInfo:
recordContentSource: ltu
recordCreationDate: 2016-09-29
identifier:
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-7685
10.1080/01446193.2013.828846
2-s2.0-84887048476
6173f8b8-8e90-4811-9cc7-c13a028b8f13
titleInfo:
@attributes:
lang: eng
title: Production strategies for pre-engineering in house-building
subTitle: Exploring product development platforms
abstract: Construction is a trade where the dominating production strategy is engineer-to-order. House-builders can pre-engineer their design to different degrees resulting in variations of the engineer-to-order strategy: design-to-order adapt-to-order and engineer-to-stock. This variation causes different settings for the use ofplatforms in house-building. The aim of this research is to diversify the engineer-to-order production strategy and its consequences for platform organization by studying its use in house-building. The multiple case study on four engineering/contractor firms reports the core capabilities for engineer-to-order firms: procurement and tendering market knowledge engineering multi-skilled manufacturing and coordination of sales and manufacturing. Design-to-order adapt-to-order and engineer-to stock were shown to be production strategies in use in house-building. In design-to-order platforms parts of the platform are undefined while engineer-to-stock platforms are fully predefined. Coordination between market and manufacturing is a crucial capability when engaging in platform organization. When an engineering firm and a contractor collaborate to fulfil client needs the coordination capability between market and manufacturing was shown to be low. The case study shows that specialized contractors who integrate the supply chain towards a specific market segment benefit fully from the platform concept while contractors with a wider scope could focus on standardization of processes rather than products.
subject:
@attributes:
lang: eng
authority: uka.se
topic:
Engineering and Technology
Civil Engineering
Building Technologies
@attributes:
lang: swe
authority: uka.se
topic:
Teknik och teknologier
Samhällsbyggnadsteknik
Husbyggnad
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: engineer-to-order
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: industrialized building
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: Civil engineering and architecture - Building engineering
@attributes:
lang: swe
topic: Samhällsbyggnadsteknik och arkitektur - Byggnadsteknik
@attributes:
lang: swe
authority: ltu
topic: Träbyggnad
genre: Research subject
@attributes:
lang: eng
authority: ltu
topic: Timber Structures
genre: Research subject
language:
languageTerm: eng
genre:
publication/journal-article
ref
note:
Published
1
Validerad; 2013; 20130814 (heljoh)
name:
@attributes:
type: personal
authority: ltu
namePart:
Johnsson
Helena
role:
roleTerm: aut
affiliation:
Luleå tekniska universitet
Byggkonstruktion och -produktion
nameIdentifier:
heljoh
0000-0002-5907-7788
relatedItem:
@attributes:
type: host
genre: project
titleInfo:
title: Lean Wood Engineering
@attributes:
type: host
titleInfo:
title: Construction Management and Economics
identifier:
0144-6193
1466-433X
part:
detail:
@attributes:
type: volume
number: 31
@attributes:
type: issue
number: 9
extent:
start: 941
end: 958
originInfo:
dateIssued: 2013
physicalDescription:
form: print
typeOfResource: text