Towards integrated geometallurgical approach

Critical review of current practices and future trends

Document identifier: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-76530
Access full text here:10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106072
Keyword: Engineering and Technology, Materials Engineering, Metallurgy and Metallic Materials, Teknik och teknologier, Materialteknik, Metallurgi och metalliska material, Resource efficient, Mineral processing, Primary resources, Geometallurgy, Modelling and simulation, Mine’s production chain, Mineral Processing, Mineralteknik
Publication year: 2020
Relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
SDG 9 Industry, innovation and infrastructureSDG 11 Sustainable cities and communities
The SDG label(s) above have been assigned by OSDG.ai

Abstract:

Geometallurgy has become an important tool for mitigating production risks and improving economic performance in the modern mining industry. Multiple definitions and visions of geometallurgy have been proposed during the last decades. Most of them define geometallurgy as a bridge between geology and mineral processing. Such a definition is rather confusing since process mineralogy claims to be such “bridge” too. Therefore, the main objective of the present paper is to provide a broad image of geometallurgy covering planning, executing and evaluation of geometallurgical programs. Such a vision of geometallurgy was developed within a research project PREP, which was aimed at “resource effective mineral processing”. PREP is a holistic geometallurgical approach independent of deposit type. The approach differentiates geometallurgical programs based on the complexity of the problem and the desirable outcome. Particular attention was paid to the planning of the geometallurgical programs, data management, and new tools development. The practical usage of the approach was tested with three case studies: iron-apatite ore, VMS, and Cu porphyry deposits. Some examples of applying geometallurgy for the iron-apatite ore are shown in this paper. The result, the guidelines on planning, executing and evaluating a geometallurgical program, are given in this paper.

Authors

Viktor Lishchuk

Luleå tekniska universitet; Mineralteknik och metallurgi; Metso Sweden AB, Sala, Sweden
Other publications >>

Pierre-Henri Koch

Luleå tekniska universitet; Mineralteknik och metallurgi
Other publications >>

Yousef Ghorbani

Luleå tekniska universitet; Mineralteknik och metallurgi
Other publications >>

Alan R. Butcher

eological Survey of Finland/Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Espoo, Finland
Other publications >>

Record metadata

Click to view metadata