Sense-making and sense-giving:
Reaching through the smokescreen of sustainability disclosure in the stock market
Document identifier: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-76331
Access full text here:
10.1007/978-3-319-93266-8_4Keyword: Social Sciences,
Economics and Business,
Business Administration,
Samhällsvetenskap,
Ekonomi och näringsliv,
Företagsekonomi,
Sustainability information Financial analysts Cognitive frames Cognitive dissonance,
Sense-making,
Sense-giving,
Social legitimacy,
Cognitive legitimacy,
Accounting and Control,
Redovisning och styrningPublication year: 2019Relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
The SDG label(s) above have been assigned by OSDG.aiAbstract: Financial analysts’ role as information intermediaries between management teams and investors is vital for the efficient allocation of resources on the stock market. The increased focus on sustainability information in corporate reports has affected financial analysts in their important work of interpreting, assessing and communicating value-added information to their clients, i.e. the investors. The challenges they face relate to the ambiguous nature of sustainability information and its difference from traditional financial information. How do analysts reach through this smokescreen? How do analysts make sense of sustainability information, and how do they give sense to this information when they provide investment advices to their investors? In this chapter, these challenges are addressed from a cognitive-frame perspective. We argue that the first part of 2000s was characterized by cognitive dissonance due to both a low social legitimacy and a low cognitive legitimacy, i.e. sustainability was not yet requested by the investors to be attended to and it was regarded too ambiguous to be relevant for being considered in a valuation context. In the latter part of 2010s, we argue that there is only a partial cognitive dissonance. At this time, sustainability information is beginning to be socially legitimate and requested by investors. However, the complexity of the situation remains. This type of information is still not considered as cognitive legitimate due to the ambiguous nature, which renders difficulties for the sense-making and sense-giving processes. The findings have implications not the least in the ongoing quest of developing frameworks, standards and legislation (e.g. the EU directive (2014/EU/95)), that opt for improving the relevance, credibility and comparability of sustainability information.
Authors
Susanne Arvidsson
Lund University
Other publications
>>
Jeaneth Johansson
Luleå tekniska universitet; Industriell Ekonomi; Entreprenörskap och innovation
Other publications
>>
Record metadata
Click to view metadata
header:
identifier: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-76331
datestamp: 2021-04-19T13:09:27Z
setSpec: SwePub-ltu
metadata:
mods:
@attributes:
version: 3.7
recordInfo:
recordContentSource: ltu
recordCreationDate: 2019-10-09
identifier:
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-76331
10.1007/978-3-319-93266-8_4
2-s2.0-85063422748
titleInfo:
@attributes:
lang: eng
title: Sense-making and sense-giving:
subTitle: Reaching through the smokescreen of sustainability disclosure in the stock market
abstract: Financial analysts’ role as information intermediaries between management teams and investors is vital for the efficient allocation of resources on the stock market. The increased focus on sustainability information in corporate reports has affected financial analysts in their important work of interpreting assessing and communicating value-added information to their clients i.e. the investors. The challenges they face relate to the ambiguous nature of sustainability information and its difference from traditional financial information. How do analysts reach through this smokescreen? How do analysts make sense of sustainability information and how do they give sense to this information when they provide investment advices to their investors? In this chapter these challenges are addressed from a cognitive-frame perspective. We argue that the first part of 2000s was characterized by cognitive dissonance due to both a low social legitimacy and a low cognitive legitimacy i.e. sustainability was not yet requested by the investors to be attended to and it was regarded too ambiguous to be relevant for being considered in a valuation context. In the latter part of 2010s we argue that there is only a partial cognitive dissonance. At this time sustainability information is beginning to be socially legitimate and requested by investors. However the complexity of the situation remains. This type of information is still not considered as cognitive legitimate due to the ambiguous nature which renders difficulties for the sense-making and sense-giving processes. The findings have implications not the least in the ongoing quest of developing frameworks standards and legislation (e.g. the EU directive (2014/EU/95)) that opt for improving the relevance credibility and comparability of sustainability information.
subject:
@attributes:
lang: eng
authority: uka.se
topic:
Social Sciences
Economics and Business
Business Administration
@attributes:
lang: swe
authority: uka.se
topic:
Samhällsvetenskap
Ekonomi och näringsliv
Företagsekonomi
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: Sustainability information Financial analysts Cognitive frames Cognitive dissonance
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: Sense-making
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: Sense-giving
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: Social legitimacy
@attributes:
lang: eng
topic: Cognitive legitimacy
@attributes:
lang: eng
authority: ltu
topic: Accounting and Control
genre: Research subject
@attributes:
lang: swe
authority: ltu
topic: Redovisning och styrning
genre: Research subject
language:
languageTerm: eng
genre:
publication/book-chapter
ref
note:
Published
2
name:
@attributes:
type: personal
namePart:
Arvidsson
Susanne
role:
roleTerm: aut
affiliation: Lund University
@attributes:
type: personal
authority: ltu
namePart:
Johansson
Jeaneth
role:
roleTerm: aut
affiliation:
Luleå tekniska universitet
Industriell Ekonomi
Entreprenörskap och innovation
nameIdentifier:
jeaneth
0000-0002-3377-6177
originInfo:
dateIssued: 2019
publisher: Springer Nature
relatedItem:
@attributes:
type: host
titleInfo:
title: Challenges in Managing Sustainable Business
subTitle: Reporting Taxation Ethics and Governance
part:
extent:
start: 77
end: 109
identifier:
978-3-319-93266-8
978-3-319-93265-1
physicalDescription:
form: print
typeOfResource: text